<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: at&amp;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/</link>
	<description>an unlikely place for a CS grad student.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: twood</title>
		<link>http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>twood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcornfarmer.com/?p=166#comment-129</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Scab workers do not necessarily need to be union members -- anyone who goes to work to replace union workers while they are on strike can be considered a scab. There is no doubt that at&amp;t is training the managers in part to use them as leverage against the union. 

That said, the point of my post was to be a humorous view on what is clearly a rather ridiculous situation. If each side did not need to spend so much effort posturing, and instead could just sit down and reasonably discuss their demands, I think the situation could be resolved much more efficiently.

Also, I should make it clear that I&#039;m not really criticizing at&amp;t in particular here -- the issues I raise are common across most large corporations, and I had a great time during my job at at&amp;t (and I wasn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;that lousy&lt;/i&gt; an employee ;p ). I just find it pretty funny that they wanted to train someone doing a two month long internship in new jersey to become an air pressure technician out in texas, in case a strike occurred four months after his job ended!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Scab workers do not necessarily need to be union members &#8212; anyone who goes to work to replace union workers while they are on strike can be considered a scab. There is no doubt that at&#038;t is training the managers in part to use them as leverage against the union. </p>
<p>That said, the point of my post was to be a humorous view on what is clearly a rather ridiculous situation. If each side did not need to spend so much effort posturing, and instead could just sit down and reasonably discuss their demands, I think the situation could be resolved much more efficiently.</p>
<p>Also, I should make it clear that I&#8217;m not really criticizing at&#038;t in particular here &#8212; the issues I raise are common across most large corporations, and I had a great time during my job at at&#038;t (and I wasn&#8217;t <i>that lousy</i> an employee ;p ). I just find it pretty funny that they wanted to train someone doing a two month long internship in new jersey to become an air pressure technician out in texas, in case a strike occurred four months after his job ended!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcornfarmer.com/?p=166#comment-128</guid>
		<description>First of all, managers are not the scabs. Scabs are union employees crossing their own picket lines to work anyway. Managers are in training only if a work stoppage occurs, not that their jobs are not important. Union employees perform a large part of AT&amp;T&#039;s daily duties. And AT&amp;T does not dig ditches to your house. This work is contracted to outside construction companies. There is a huge number of technical and labor intensive jobs that will need to be performed should the contract not be settled in a timely manner. At this time, union employees are still working and negotiations are still on. Thank goodness you were gone in December. You seem to be a lousy employee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, managers are not the scabs. Scabs are union employees crossing their own picket lines to work anyway. Managers are in training only if a work stoppage occurs, not that their jobs are not important. Union employees perform a large part of AT&amp;T&#8217;s daily duties. And AT&amp;T does not dig ditches to your house. This work is contracted to outside construction companies. There is a huge number of technical and labor intensive jobs that will need to be performed should the contract not be settled in a timely manner. At this time, union employees are still working and negotiations are still on. Thank goodness you were gone in December. You seem to be a lousy employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twood</title>
		<link>http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>twood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcornfarmer.com/?p=166#comment-101</guid>
		<description>yeah... it&#039;s pretty ridiculous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230; it&#8217;s pretty ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.popcornfarmer.com/2008/11/att/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcornfarmer.com/?p=166#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Ironically, if they put all that money they are using for training toward something the union workers want/need, it would probably be a better use of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, if they put all that money they are using for training toward something the union workers want/need, it would probably be a better use of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.362 seconds -->
